Skip to Content

Measures Related to the Exportation of Rare Earths, Tungsten and Molybdenum

Key Facts
Short Title: Rare Earths
Respondent: China
Third Parties: Argentina; Brazil; Canada; Colombia; Chinese Taipei; European Union; Norway; Oman; Russia; Saudi Arabia; Turkey; India; Vietnam;
Complaintant(s): United States;
Dispute Number: DS431
Link to Dispute Site: http://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/dispu_e/cases_e/ds431_e.htm
Dispute Subject(s): Export Restrictions;
Dispute Status: Pending

On 13 March 2012, the United States requested consultations with China with respect to China's restrictions on the export of various forms of rare earths, tungsten and molybdenum. The request refers to materials falling under but not limited to 212 eight-digit Chinese Customs Commodity Codes and over 30 measures. The request also refers to a number of Chinese published as well as unpublished measures that, operating separately or collectively, allegedly impose and administer export restrictions. These restrictions include export duties, export quotas, minimum export price requirements, export licensing requirements and additional requirements and procedures in connection with the administration of the quantitative restrictions.

The United States claims that these measures are inconsistent with:

• Articles VII, VIII, X and XI of the GATT 1994; and

• paragraphs 2(A)2, 2(C)1, 5.1, 5.2, 7.2, 8.2 and 11.3 of Part I of China's Protocol of Accession, as well as China's obligations under paragraph 1.2 of Part I of the Protocol
  of Accession.  

On 22 March 2012, the European Union and Japan requested to join the consultations. On 26 March 2012, Canada requested to join the consultations. Subsequently, China informed the DSB that it had accepted the requests of Canada, the European Union and Japan to join the consultations.

On 27 June 2012, the United States requested the establishment of a panel. At its meeting on 10 July 2012, the DSB deferred the establishment of a panel.

Panel and Appellate Body proceedings

At its meeting on 23 July 2012, the DSB established a single panel pursuant to Article 9.1 of the DSU to examine this dispute, DS432 and DS433. Brazil, Canada, Colombia, the European Union, India, Japan, Korea, Norway, Oman, Saudi Arabia, Chinese Taipei and Viet Nam reserved their third party rights. Subsequently, Argentina, Australia, Indonesia, Peru, Russia and Turkey reserved their third party rights. On 12 September 2012, the United States, the European Union and Japan requested the Director-General to compose the panel. On 24 September 2012, the Director-General composed the panel. 

Panel Proceedings
Brief DateBrief Description
07/25/2013Second Integrated Executive Summary of the United States
07/17/2013Comments of the United States on China’s Answers to the Panel’s Questions in Connection with the Second Hearing
07/08/2013Answers of the United States to the Panel’s Questions in Connection with the Second Hearing
06/18/2013Opening Statement of the United States at Second Panel Meeting
06/18/2013Closing Statement of the United States at Second Panel Meeting
04/25/2013Answers of the United States to the Panel’s Questions Received April 11, 2013
04/25/2013Second Written Submission of the United States
04/09/2013First Integrated Executive Summary of the United States
03/25/2013Comments of the United States on China’s Answers to the First Set of Panel Questions
03/14/2013Answers of the United States to the First Set of Panel Questions
02/28/2013Closing Statement of the United States at the First Panel Meeting
02/26/2013Opening Statement of the United States at the First Panel Meeting
10/30/2012First Written Submission of the United States 
Appellate Proceedings
Brief DateBrief Description
 
06/04/2014Opening Statement of the United States
05/16/2014U.S. Third Participant Submission
05/01/2014U.S. Appellee Submission
04/08/2014U.S. Appellant Submission