Skip to Content

Countervailing and Anti-Dumping Measures

Key Facts
Short Title: US — Countervailing and Anti-Dumping Measures (China)
Respondent: United States
Third Parties: Canada; European Union; Russia; Turkey; Japan; India; Australia; Vietnam;
Complaintant(s): China;
Dispute Number: DS449
Link to Dispute Site: http://wto.org/english/tratop_e/dispu_e/cases_e/ds449_e.htm
Dispute Subject(s): Anti-dumping Measures;
Dispute Status: Pending

Consultations

Complaint by China.

On 17 September 2012, China requested consultations with the United States concerning the following measures:

(i) a new piece of legislation (Public Law 112-99) that explicitly allows for the application of countervailing measures to non-market economy countries;

(ii) countervailing duty determinations or actions made or performed by US authorities between 20 November 2006 and 13 March 2012 in respect of Chinese products;

(iii) anti-dumping measures associated with the concerned countervailing duty measures as well as the combined effect of these anti-dumping measures and the parallel countervailing duty measures; and 

(iv) the United States' failure to provide the US Department of Commerce (USDOC) with legal authority to identify and avoid the double remedies in respect of investigations or reviews initiated on or between 20 November 2006 and 13 March 2012. 
China considers that these measures are inconsistent with: 

• Articles 10, 15, 19, 21 and 32 of the SCM Agreement; 
• Articles VI, X:1, X:2 and X:3 of the GATT 1994; and 
• Articles 9 and 11 of the Anti-Dumping Agreement. 

On 19 November 2012, China requested the establishment of a panel. At its meeting on 30 November 2012, the DSB deferred the establishment of a panel. 

Panel and Appellate Body proceedings 

At its meeting on 17 December 2012, the DSB established a panel. Australia, Canada, the European Union, Japan, Turkey and Viet Nam reserved their third party rights. Subsequently, India and the Russian Federation reserved their third party rights. On 21 February 2013, China requested the Director-General to determine the composition of the panel. On 4 March 2013, the Director-General composed the panel.
Panel Proceedings
Brief DateBrief Description
09/27/2013Comments of the United States on China’s Responses to the Panel’s Questions Following the Second Meeting
09/13/2013Responses of the United States to the Panel’s Questions Following the Second Hearing
09/03/2013Executive Summary of the Opening Statement of the United States at the Second Panel Hearing
08/27/2013Opening Statement of the United States at the Second Panel Hearing
08/08/2013Executive Summary of the Second Written Submission of the United States
08/01/2013Second Written Submission of the United States
07/18/2013Responses of the United States to the Panel’s Questions Following the First Hearing
07/10/2013Executive Summary of the Opening Statement of the United States at the First Panel Hearing
07/02/2013Opening Statement of the United States at the First Panel Hearing
05/19/2013Executive Summary of first Written Submission of the United States
05/12/2013
First Written Submission of the United States


Appellate Proceedings
Brief DateBrief Description
 
04/30/2014Appellee Submission of the United States
04/17/2014Other Appellant Submission of the United States